Become a Guest Blogger

Subscribe by E-mail

Your email:

Follow Us

Horn Talk Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

New Mercy For Animals Video Shows Animal Cruelty and Dehorning

 
Mercy For Animals (MFA) has released another undercover video, this one documenting animal cruelty by some workers at the E6 Cattle Company, a calf raising operation in Hart, TX. The abuses have been rightly condemned by company owners, animal welfare activists, and the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), which called the beatings “barbaric, inhumane and unacceptable.” The workers were fired.

The video also depicts workers burning horn buds off calves with a hot-iron and, in one scene, a branding iron.

The acts of cruelty shown are truly repugnant and definitely not typical of responsible calf raising facilities or any livestock operation for that matter. But the dehorning procedures depicted are standard management practices on many farms, and are not, in themselves, gratuitously cruel. By including these scenes in its compilation of abuses, MFA has, unfortunately, lumped dehorning into the same “horrifying” category as euthanizing calves with hammers and pickaxes.

Dehorning is a necessary management practice that greatly reduces the risk of injury to humans, horses, dogs and, of course, calves themselves (udders, flanks and eyes are particularly susceptible to gouging). The AVMA’s Animal Welfare Policy recommends that dehorning be performed “at the earliest age practicable”, while noted animal welfare activist Dr. Temple Grandin has said, “There is no excuse for not dehorning very young calves.”

The majority of dairy producers and many beef producers practice hot-iron disbudding, which is certainly preferable to dehorning at later stages with more invasive methods. That said, hot-iron dehorning is painful, and producers should use analgesia and/or sedation whenever possible.

A more humane alternative is caustic paste disbudding, which has been shown to be less painful than hot-iron dehorning. The non-sedated, non-medicated calf in this video, for example, barely reacts when dehorning paste is applied.


Do you think dehorning should have been included in Mercy For Animal’s undercover video of abuses at E6 Cattle Company?

Other Sources:

Mercy For Animals Investigation Into a Texan Calf Farm. April 20, 2011. http://vegangstaz.wordpress.com/2011/04/20/mercy-for-animals-investigation-into-a-texan-calf-farm/

Veterinary Practice News. “Abuse of Calves is ‘Unacceptable’, AVMA Says.” April 20, 2011. http://www.veterinarypracticenews.com/vet-breaking-news/2011/04/20/undercover-video-showing-abuse-of-calves-is-unacceptable-avma-says.aspx

Welfare Implications of the Dehorning and Disbudding of Cattle. American Veterinary Medical Association. June 8, 2011. http://www.avma.org/reference/backgrounders/dehorning_cattle_bgnd.asp

Temple Grandin. Bruise Levels on Fed and Non-Fed Cattle. Proceedings Livestock Conservation Institute. April 5-7, 1995. http://www.grandin.com/references/LCIbruise.html

Vickers, K.J., et al. Calf Response to Caustic Paste and Hot-Iron Dehorning Using Sedation With and Without Local Anesthetic.  J. Dairy Sci. 88: 1454-1459, 2005.

Comments

While dehorning/disbudding is a necessary farm practice at this time, it WILL be used against animal agriculture by animal rights and animal welfare groups. The beef industry in the US has mostly eliminated horns with genetic selection for the polled trait. The dairy industry needs to do likewise, or it will constantly be dealing with incidents like this. 
 
 
 
Analgesia and sedation are not practical, as some users will skip them to save time, leaving the industry open to videos of abuse. 
 
 
 
I have not used caustic pastes since I was young. I remember using 3 different brands. Two were painless, but are no longer available. The other caused a great deal of pain to calves, and was not practical to use. I will never use that again.  
 
 
 
What all brands of caustic paste are now available?
Posted @ Saturday, July 02, 2011 8:57 AM by Wendell Miller
Currently, there are two U.S. manufacturers of dehorning paste, with the primary manufacturer being Dr. 
 
Naylor's. This product has been used in many of the research trials discussed on this website. In addition, the calf paste disbudding video on our website demonstrates how to use dehorning paste correctly. Typically, when users have poor results with dehorning paste it is due to not following manufacturers recommendations. 
 
 
 
As with any medical procedure following protocols is essential for the welfare of the animal. In this instance, dehorning with paste within a few days of birth and then feeding the animal creates a very benign experience. 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:42 PM by Dave Lucas
The JDS article mentioned calves rubbing their head with their feet. That's the problem I remember, because that spread the caustic paste all over the head. 
 
The only success I had with the painful caustic paste was by using it on the day the calf was born. Then they are too young to know what to do about the pain. 
 
That is not practical for me at this time. It is much more labor efficient to disbud a group of calves with a hot iron.
Posted @ Friday, July 08, 2011 6:01 PM by Wendell
I’m glad to hear you successfully disbudded calves right after birth using caustic paste. That is the best time to disbud, as discussed in many of the articles and papers on this Website. 
 
Delaying disbudding to coordinate with other tasks may save time but early-age disbudding with caustic paste has been shown to be less painful than hot-iron dehorning, even when a local anesthetic is used. 
 
Posted @ Friday, July 15, 2011 9:01 AM by Dave Lucas
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics