Become a Guest Blogger

Subscribe by E-mail

Your email:

Follow Us

Horn Talk Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Dehorning in Europe

 
Last November, the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Health and Consumers, Animal Health and Welfare Directorate released a study on alternatives to cattle dehorning in the European Union. It provides a fascinating glimpse into food animal management practices overseas, highlighting some surprising similarities and differences between operations in Europe and here in the U.S.

Nearly 100 dairy and beef farmers in Italy, Germany and France were interviewed about their practices and attitudes toward dehorning. Compared to U.S. producers, farmers in Europe were slightly less likely to dehorn dairy cattle (approximately 80 percent hornless), and much less likely to dehorn beef cattle (less than 40 percent hornless).1

Most E.U. farmers prefer disbudding over dehorning. Hot-iron disbudding is the most used method, however, the use of caustic paste appears more frequent in the South and the Eastern member states. Surprisingly, most beef farmers in Europe prefer hot-iron disbudding, in contrast to U.S. beef producers, who mostly use mechanical methods. Reasons cited for disbudding as opposed to dehorning include ease for the operator and less pain and stress on calves.1

These findings are consistent with dehorning practices in other countries, including Canada, where the CVMA recommends disbudding in the first week of life, and New Zealand and Australia, where authorities recommend disbudding at the youngest age possible.2

Raising polled animals is an alternative explored in the study. Currently, the prevalence of polled cattle in Europe is very low, less than one percent for dairy and less than four percent for beef.1 European farmers have indicate they may be interested in polled bulls with high genetic merit, and the development of breeding programs for Holstein and Charolais cattle are underway.  Some negative traits have appeared in German Fleckvieh breeding programs, and more research is needed to determine if these are linked to the polled gene.

What do you find most and least surprising about dehorning practices in Europe?

Footnotes:
  1. Cattle Dehorning and Alternatives in the EU. The CattleSite.com. November 2010. www.thecattlesite.com/articles/2540/cattle-dehorning-and-alternatives-in-the-eu
  2. AVMA Backgrounder: Welfare Implications of the Dehorning and Disbudding of Cattle. January 28, 2010.
Disbudding and Dehorning

Comments

I do not believe that the difference between disbudding and dehorning is relevant to animal rights/welfare activists, and the averge non-farmer probably won't see the difference either. Burning the skin of little calves in not good public relations. Applying caustic paste is only slightly better.
Posted @ Monday, June 27, 2011 6:13 AM by Wendell Miller
Wendell, 
 
 
 
Thank you for your comment. We've found that "dehorning" is the term commonly applied to horn removal in cattle of all ages, which is also why we chose it for our Website name. That said, the purpose of our Website is educational and we want people to know there is a difference between early-age disbudding and dehorning. We also want people to know that removing horn buds is a necessary farm management practice to reduce risk of injury to farm workers and other animals. Regarding the methods of horn bud removal, I personally believe caustic paste is the most humane method. 
 
 
 
Dave Lucas 
 
Posted @ Monday, June 27, 2011 10:11 AM by Dave Lucas
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics